Physics › Kinematics ›
Linear Velocity and Acceleration
Introduction to linear velocity and acceleration with an emphasis on constant acceleration.
Introduction
Key facts
Velocity is the rate of change of position with respect to time: Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with respect to time: If is the initial velocity, the final velocity, and the distance traveled in a time , then: and
Velocity is the rate of change of position with respect to time: Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with respect to time: If is the initial velocity, the final velocity, and the distance traveled in a time , then: and
Velocity and acceleration are vector quantities both measured with respect to time, where acceleration is the rate at which the object changes its velocity. Constant acceleration, the term in consideration here, assumes that the rate of change of velocity over a period of time is constant. In other words, if you were in a bus that was in a state of constant acceleration, we would say that the bus was either speeding up or slowing down at a steady, constant rate. From this approximation, the position, speed and final velocity due to the acceleration can be calculated.
Linear Velocity
In order to define linear velocity, consider a particle moving in a straight line from a fixed point , as diagramed in Figure 1.MISSING IMAGE!
746/img_linear.png cannot be found in /users/746/img_linear.png. Please contact the submission author.
Constant Acceleration
Let be the initial velocity, the final velocity, the acceleration (which in this case is a constant), the distance traveled in time , and the time. We previously saw that the acceleration can be written as . As in this case is constant, by integrating with respect to , we get: In this equation, at , becomes , and so the constant equals . Thus, (3) becomes: Integrating again with respect to , and considering that , we get: In this equation, at , becomes , and thus the constant equals . Hence, (4) becomes: Integrating this equation with respect to , and considering that , we get: As at becomes , the constant becomes . Thus (5) becomes:Example:
[imperial]
Example -
Problem
The driver of an express train traveling at 60 mph sees, on the same track, 600 ft in front of him, a slow train traveling in the same direction at 20 mph.
What is the least retardation that must be applied to the express to avoid a collision?
What is the least retardation that must be applied to the express to avoid a collision?
Workings
For the express train, , and . Taking into account that , we get:
In a time the slow train will have traveled a distance of . The express train will have gone further and will have traveled :
Moreover, considering that , we get: Combining (1) and (2), we thus obtain:from which:
Solution